You will be redirected to the website of our parent company, Schönherr Rechtsanwälte GmbH: www.schoenherr.eu
Global corporations and mid-sized companies often engage in mergers, acquisitions and divestitures as part of their globalisation strategies. The regulations under Council Directive 2001/23/EC, also known as the "ARD" or "TUPE" directive, can impact these strategies. TUPE regulations are designed to protect the rights of employees when the business they work for is transferred from one employer to another. The regulations apply to a wide range of business transfers, including sale of enterprise or even outsourcing arrangements. If you are planning an acquisition or to divest or downsize your international operations, careful consideration of these aspects is a must. Below is a brief overview of key TUPE aspects for selected Schoenherr jurisdictions.
Get an overview of TUPE and transaction, information duty and employee rights below!
|
What triggers a TUPE transfer? |
Can a third party like an employee or trade union stop or delay a TUPE transfer? |
Is post-transfer reorganisation (termination) admissible? |
Austria |
Austrian case law defines a TUPE transfer as the transfer of an economic unit that retains its identity, meaning an organised grouping of resources that has the objective of pursuing an economic activity (depending on (i) the takeover of tangible/intangible assets, key employees or a significant number of employees, clients or customers, (ii) the level of similarity of the activities carried out prior to and after the transfer, and (iii) the duration of the interruption). |
No. |
Post-transfer reorganisation measures (terminations) are only permissible for economic, technical or organisational reasons. However, any transfer-related termination (prior to or following the TUPE transfer) is null and void. Thus, the employer bears the burden of proof that the termination was not related to the transfer. |
Bulgaria |
A TUPE transfer can be triggered in case of (i) the reorganisation of a legal entity (merger, takeover, spin-off, split, change of the legal form), (ii) the transfer of a going concern or part thereof, (iii) the assignment or transfer of an activity, together with tangible assets related to it, (iv) the rent or concession of the going concern or part thereof. |
No. |
Yes, but the TUPE transfer per se may not be the reason for any redundancies (thus reorganisations are usually postponed to a later stage after the transfer to avoid any claims). Such reorganisation is generally substantiated by an economic, technical or organisational reason (e.g. reduced production, which leads to the necessity to reduce staff). If such terminations are likely to occur, they would qualify as measures envisaged in relation to the employees and thus would trigger the obligation for consultations. |
Croatia |
A TUPE transfer can be triggered as a result of a statutory change (e.g. merger) or a legal transaction, when an undertaking or part thereof or business or part thereof, which retains its economic integrity, is transferred to a new employer (e.g. organised group of employees, retaining the character post-transfer, transfer of assets, etc.). |
No. |
Generally, yes; however, the TUPE transfer per se may not be the reason for any redundancies (thus reorganisations are usually postponed to a later stage after the transfer to avoid any claims). |
Czech Republic |
A TUPE transfer can be triggered in two situations: |
No. |
Generally, yes; however, the TUPE transfer per se may not be the reason for any redundancies (thus reorganisations are usually postponed to a later stage after the transfer to avoid any claims). |
Hungary |
A TUPE transfer can be triggered in two situations: |
No. |
Yes, it is admissible; however, the TUPE transfer cannot serve as the basis for the employer to terminate the employment relationships of the affected employees or for mass redundancies. Therefore, reorganisations are typically carried out after a TUPE transfer at a later stage to avoid any claims. |
Poland |
Polish law does not define TUPE transfer or acts of law resulting in such a transfer. Assessing whether there has been a TUPE transfer requires a test consisting of the following steps: |
No. |
Generally, yes. The law does not regulate this matter. In practice, post-transfer reorganisations (terminations) commence 6-12 months after the TUPE transfer. However, the TUPE transfer itself may not be grounds for the employer's termination of the employment contract by notice. |
Romania |
A TUPE transfer can be triggered in case of transfer of ownership of undertaking, units or parts thereof aiming at the continuation of a main or secondary business object, whether profit-driven or not. |
No. |
Generally, yes; however, the TUPE transfer may not be grounds for individual or collective dismissal of employees. |
Slovakia |
A TUPE transfer can be triggered in two situations: |
No |
Generally, yes; however, the TUPE transfer per se may not be the reason for any redundancies (thus reorganisations are usually postponed to a later stage after the transfer to avoid any claims). |
Slovenia |
A TUPE transfer can be triggered in two situations: |
No. |
Generally, yes; however, the TUPE transfer per se may not be the reason for any redundancies. |
Türkiye |
No TUPE regulation. However, there are similarities with the consequences of a "Business Transfer" in Turkey |
Employees are automatically transferred in the event of a Business Transfer. The process cannot be delayed or stopped by a third party. |
Yes. However, the rights of the employees (e.g. re-employment lawsuit) arising out of individual contracts and collective bargaining agreements (if any) are protected. |
|
Is there an information duty? If yes, who must be informed/consulted? |
What must be communicated? |
Austria |
Yes, the works council must be informed of the envisaged TUPE transfer in a timely manner and in sufficient detail. If no works council is established, the affected employees must be informed in writing. |
(i) The (envisaged) date of the TUPE transfer; (ii) the reason for the TUPE transfer; (iii) the legal, economic and social consequences for the employees; and (iv) any employee-related measures in connection with the TUPE transfer. |
Bulgaria |
Yes. The trade union and the employee representatives of the transferor and the transferee must be informed. If none is present, directly affected employees must be informed. Consultations will be held only in case of measures envisaged in relation to the employees. |
The employers must provide information regarding: (i) the envisaged transfer (type of commercial transaction) and its date; (ii) the reason for the transfer; (iii) the potential legal, economic and social implications for the employees; and (iv) the measures envisaged in relation to the employees, including for obligations which arose before the transfer. |
Croatia |
Yes. The works council or the union representative (if no works council exists) must be consulted. Also, the works council as well as all directly affected employees must be informed about the TUPE transfer. |
(i) The proposed or determined date of the transfer; (ii) the reason for the transfer; (iii) the legal, economic and social consequences for the employees; and (iv) the envisaged measures regarding the employees. |
Czech Republic |
Yes. The trade union and works council must be consulted. If none is present, directly affected employees must be informed. |
(i) The proposed or determined date of the transfer; (ii) the reason for the transfer; (iii) the legal, economic and social consequences for the employees; and (iv) the envisaged measures regarding the employees. |
Hungary |
Yes. The trade union and works council must be consulted. If none is present, directly affected employees must be informed. |
(i) The date of the transfer or planned date of transfer; (ii) the reason for the transfer; (iii) the legal, economic and social consequences affecting the employee; (iv) the planned measures affecting the employee. |
Poland |
Yes. |
(i) The expected time of the TUPE transfer; |
Romania |
Yes. The trade union/employee representatives or employees (if there is no form of representation) must be informed; moreover, if any changes to the employment and working conditions are envisaged, they must be consulted as well. |
(i) The proposed or determined date of the transfer; (ii) the reason for the transfer; (iii) the legal, economic and social consequences for the employees; (iv) the envisaged measures regarding the employees; (v) working and employment conditions. |
Slovakia |
Yes. The trade union, works council or employee trustee must be informed. If none is present, directly affected employees must be informed. Measures regarding employees (if any) must be consulted with employee representatives. |
(i) The proposed or determined date of transfer; (ii) the reason for the transfer; (iii) the legal, economic and social consequences for the employees; and (iv) the envisaged measures regarding the employees. The information must be provided in writing. |
Slovenia |
Yes. The trade unions established at the employer must be consulted. If there are no trade unions, the affected employees must be informed. |
(i) The proposed or determined date of transfer; (ii) the reason for the transfer; (iii) the legal, economic and social consequences for the employees; and (iv) the envisaged measures regarding the employees. |
Türkiye |
The trade unions (if any) should be notified prior to the transfer of a business. |
(i) The proposed or determined date of transfer; (ii) the reason for the transfer; (iii) the legal, economic and social consequences for the employees; and (iv) the envisaged measures regarding the employees. |
Disclaimer
The above overview is to be read and understood as a high-level summary of key aspects of a TUPE transfer in each of the jurisdictions and we recommend taking individual advice with respect to the implementation of any actual steps. We are happy to help you.
Find an interactive overview covering also the Bulgarian, Croatian, Hungarian, Romanian, Slovakian, Slovenian and Turkish jurisdictions online: schoenherr.eu/tupe
authors: Karin Pusch, Christina Unterdünhofen, Helena Hangler, Marie Gremillot, Barbara Jóźwik